Politics
Taking One Thing Off the Plate…
In 2017, when I was serving on the Culver Stellar Committee, I volunteered to set up a Twitter, now X, account to promote Culver and the Stellar activities. Through that, I connected to Madison, Indiana, our sister Stellar Award winner, and many of the State agencies with which we were working. It was something I thought was important at the time, and I was happy to help promote Culver. Since that time, I have put up posts with pictures and reports about Town meetings, sent out promotional things and reposted many of the event announcements that appeared on Town, Gown and Lake. Most of what I see says that marketing should be multifaceted and you should meet your audience where they are. I assume some of them are on X. It wasn’t too onerous, but did take time converting PDFs to JPGs and editing things to the 140 character format. I included some humor here and there, but avoided anything I thought would be controversial.
Apparently I was wrong… Last week the Town said they had received complaints about it being too political. I’m not sure if that’s just because of the Elon controversy and the fact that it is X or if there was something else. (Maybe someone was upset about me reposting Notre Dame Women’s Basketball posts?) They couldn’t tell me what the issue was as this was decided without looking at the site, so it will remain one of life’s mysteries. I have at time posted or reposted things from elected officials, but never from candidates. In any case, I was asked to take the references to the Town off the feed or shut it down. 1) I was doing this as an promotion for the Town and if they don’t want that, I just won’t do it. (Thus this post’s title.) and 2) It’s not worth my time to figure out either of those things, so I made one last post and I’m letting it sit idle.
I’m choosing, mostly, to take this as a time saver for me. I do think it was a positive for Culver or I wouldn’t have continued it. Out of curiosity, I went back and looked and the site had 327 followers, including: News/Talk 95.3 MNC, Michiana Life, Pulaski County Community Foundation, Startup South Bend, INDOT Northwest, The Ron Rubin School for the Entrepreneur, Marshall County LLN, Swan Lake Resort, Anita Goodan (reporter), Purdue Center for Regional Development, Leadership Marshall County, Madison Main Street Program, Argos Hardware, Visit Marshall County, Marshall County Blueberry Festival, Summer Horan ABC57, The Pilot News, The Lakes Magazine, Patronicity, Indiana Philanthropy Alliance, Indiana Bond Bank, Jeff Rea (South Bend Chamber, South Bend Tribune, Economic Outlook), Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs (OCRA), South Bend Elkhart Regional Partnership, US Fish and Wildlife, Hoosier State Chronicles, Suzanne Crouch (former Lt. Gov.), Launch Indy, Max 98.3, Visit Indiana, Marian University, Inside INdiana Business, Indiana Economic Development Corp. (IEDC), AIM, Marshall County EDC and that’s every entity and none of the people. Many of those sites are from outside Culver, so they were seeing Lions Club Pancake Breakfasts, Lakefest calendars, and other events they might not have otherwise seen. Honestly, I don’t know if those are all still active sites, but they were at one time when they chose to connect to Culver. And maybe having that many followers is the problem, since I’ve been so political and controversial! Ha!
Most people don’t know that I was behind the @CulverISstellar site and I mostly took pains to keep it that way. I was doing this as something to give back to the Town. I feel it was an asset to the Town or I wouldn’t have been doing it. As is typical with social media these days, apparently someone couldn’t just scroll on. If there had been a negative comment with someone questioning a post, I would have just taken it down. I hope it was not just at Town control issue, because that would be even more sad. I made 6,547 posts over the last 8 years. With X, it’s hard to tell who is looking unless you’re controversial. I wasn’t.
In any case, this is another end of an era for me. Such is life.
End of an Era
With the retirement of Marshall County Commissioner, Kevin Overmyer, 2024 is the end of an era. Kevin, like is father, Glenn, served multiple terms as Marshall County Commissioner. In total, Marshall County went 46 out of the last 52 years with an Overmyer at the helm. I know there has been some ugliness over the last couple of years, but the positive impact of Kevin and his family has had on the county is undeniable.
A few years ago, a friend decided to run against Kevin. I was asked to support him in his bid to replace Kevin. My friend told me he thought Kevin’s time was up and that he could do a better job. I had to explain to him that, 1) He might be able to do as good a job… eventually…, but 2) As long as Kevin was willing to serve, his knowledge and connections were invaluable. This was a difficult position for me to take as I generally agree with the idea of term limits, the transfer of power, and the value of new blood. The problem is as long as that’s not a universal concept, the value of connections to politician at the State level are undeniable for a small rural county like ours. His respect in the larger State arena was shown when he was elected President of the Indiana Association of County Commissioners (IACC) Northwest District.
The above was demonstrated to me during my time serving on the board of MCEDC. A new project in Bourbon drew attention and support from the State. State officials attended the meeting and speeches were made. As was generally the case, Kevin was not one who wanted the spotlight, but it was turned on him by the State officials in their speeches and in the casual conversation at the reception that followed. Stories were told of Kevin’s trips to Indianapolis for meetings as well as kitchen table meetings with these officials in Kevin’s home. Kevin understood the power of these connections and that power was subtly demonstrated that day.
Kevin also understood the value of keeping Marshall County on the map. He made a false start at an economic development entity several years before MCEDC came to be. It failed due to some of the petty bickering that often occurs between municipalities, i.e. what I have referred to in the past as the lasting legacy of old basketball rivalries. Rather than dropping the initiative, he let the idea cool and simmer. Then, learning from his mistakes in the first attempt, he resurrected it in a new form, addressing the stumbling blocks of the previous attempt. This is what became MCEDC (Marshall County Economic Development Corporation), without which our county wouldn’t have made strides to create shell buildings that brought in new businesses, wouldn’t have created the partnership that brought Regional Cities dollars to Marshall County and kept us in that partnership, participating in READI and READI 2.0. When I was Chairman of MCEDC, I recognized the struggle with the municipal rivalries and with Kevin’s (and Roger Umbaugh‘s) help MCEDC created what became the quarterly County Development for the Future meetings. Those meeting broke down barriers, which helped Culver achieve Stellar Community status. That lead to Kevin co-chairing Marshall County’s Stellar aspirations and eventually achieving Stellar Region status.
Kevin also understood the need to work together and move things forward. Bureaucracies are born to grow and create barriers. Even at the County level, this is the case. Kevin had a keen eye for when the red tape was necessary and when it was just an impediment. He was someone you could call to make the right connections, make determinations between what was just policy and what was law, and help make things happen. He was adept at doing this, not only with those under his direct jurisdiction, but down stream in municipalities and upstream at the State. Kevin had a keen nose for BS and who was trying to do the right thing and who was trying to just skirt the rules.
I understand Kevin’s desire to retire and leave the stress behind. He has served Marshall County well, though that isn’t always recognized and no one is perfect. All and all, I feel he’s left a positive legacy. Which is the best any politician can do.
So, I want to end this wishing Jesse Bohannon the best and with the hope that he also can create a positive legacy in his time in office serving as commissioner. It won’t be easy and some of the rancor from the campaign will make this less than a smooth transition. As with my friend I mentioned earlier, I know those relationships can built again, but there is no shortcut for the time that requires. Kevin had a bit of a shortcut through his family name and Glenn’s years of service. Jesse will need to build that all on his own. Good luck Jesse! I hope people remember your time in office fondly 20 years from now too!
Blue Dot
It appears there is a nascent Blue Dot campaign in Culver. Don’t worry if you don’t know what that it is. I had to research it as well. Nebraska and Maine are the only two states that don’t award all of their electoral college votes to one candidate. In those states, two electoral college votes go with the state majority and the others are awarded by district. As with many states, the rural areas go red and the larger cities tend blue. With Nebraska being a deep red state, the blue dot campaign in Omaha is attempting to get at least one Nebraska electoral college vote for Kamala Harris.
This has me curious what statement is being made with the blue dot in Culver… If it’s a “made you look” thing, then I guess it was successful at least once. It caused me to hit the internet for an explanation. I guess it could be a statement of solidarity, since much like Nebraska, Indiana (and Culver and Marshall County) is pretty red. Culver often struggles to find Democrats to fill positions on boards that require political balance. Maybe they’re a Nebraska transplant and don’t understand the different differences in state election laws. Or they’re just a Cornhusker and this is another way to show college loyalty.
I’m not a fan of single ticket voting. Since there are no names or information with this campaign, I assume that’s what’s being suggested. The local (county) Republican party is also pushing a straight ticket campaign in some of their ads, and I feel the same way about that… particularly on lower ballet candidates. I am likewise not a fan of general get-out-the-vote drives when they are political party driven. There needs to be more done to promote voting as a privilege and that becoming an educated voter is important.
I am curious about the implications of Nebraska’s (since 1992) and Maine’s (since 1972) take on the winner-take-all electoral college system used by other states. I am definitely not in the camp that wants to eliminate the electoral college. Much like the Senate having two Senators per state, regardless of size and population, it is a means of protecting states’ rights and assuring that there is representation across the board for minority states. It is why we were formed as a Republic and not a true Democracy. (Though we are a Democratic Republic.) I would be interested in what an analysis of expanding the Nebraska scenario to other states would look like, but I couldn’t find it.
I’ll be watching for other blue dots in Culver. It’s an interesting development and if nothing else, another curiosity of small town Culver life.
Sunny Thoughts on Solar Panels
I’ve been watching/reading about all the Solar Farm controversy in Marshall County with a mixture of amusement and disappointment. While I don’t advocate unlimited rights to a property owner, I would advocate tipping the scale in favor of the owner’s decisions about use of their property. My main thought is how the more things change, the more they stay the same. This is a repeat of what happened when there was the discussion about wind farms in Marshall County a few years back. (Wind Farm Posts here and here.)
In both cases, spurious arguments are put forth, when I believe the real reason for disliking either of them is aesthetics. Those against them don’t like looking at them. As with wind farms, I can understand that and feel it is a valid argument. To each, there own… But it was a much more understandable argument regarding wind farms than solar panels.
The setbacks of 300′, 500′ or more being requested seem ridiculous. Marshall County isn’t a table top, but it is pretty darned flat. The high point in Marshall County is 895 MSL and the low point is 775 MSL with an average of 810 MSL per the Joint Highway Research Project by Purdue University. That’s not a whole lot of topographic relief and I’m suspicious that the low number is actually under water! That tells you that there aren’t many areas where a grove of 20′ to 30′ evergreens or mixed plantings wouldn’t hide what’s in the field from anyone on the ground; even from a distance. This would solve the concern some have expressed about the sun reflecting off the panels too. Large setbacks are usually used to protect against noise or odors, not visual issues that can be hidden by a vegetative buffer. These setbacks requested are meant to make property unbuildable unless it’s an excessively large tract of land. Admittedly, I’m pretty indifferent on the aesthetic issue, but I don’t know that a picked cornfield with an inactive sprinkler system sitting vacant from Fall until Spring is a particularly bucolic landscape view either. It is just one of those things that we live with and allow to the property owner.
There is the argument about chemicals from solar panels leaching into the soil. For the most part, new solar panels are solid state devices composed of silicon and glass, with trace amounts of gold, silver, copper and other valuable materials which people in the industry will be glad to retrieve and recycle. There is also the issue that most farmers are leasing land that is marginally productive as farmland, which requires large chemical applications to make them productive. Some of these properties were potato farms in the past, which required hundreds of pounds of fertilizer per acre. As part of this argument, I’ve heard, “Why not put solar panels up to cover parking lots and buildings first, before threatening farmland!?” If there was any merit to the chemical leaching argument, I would much rather have any bad things filtered through soil, rather than running directly into storm drains and thus, our rivers and streams. There’s enough of that coming off cars and trucks in parking lots and on streets. Not that I don’t see merit in solar panels for covered parking. But I assume it’s the same reason they don’t graze cows in solar farm fields. They would need to greatly beef up (pun intended) the support structures for cows rubbing against them and thus, even more so for cars.
There are those that express concern about the loss of farmland which currently produces food products. I would prefer to see some soil analysis and see solar farms placed only on marginally productive land, but much of the placement is based on access to the electric grid. To some extent this is self regulating with property owners making the economic decision themselves. I am sure, if the payout for farming was greater, the land would remain in crops. At it’s greatest proposed coverage, the proposed solar farms would only cover single digit percentages of the total Marshall County farmland available. Is this any different than allowing subdivisions to be built and lots to be sold for housing or industry? Plus, check out some of the interesting things Purdue University is suggesting for agrivoltaics. There are options to keep farms productive as food sources as well as for harvesting solar. They’re just two different ways of harvesting sunshine.
There are those that say solar is a boondoggle and wouldn’t make it without subsidies. Possibly, but farmers know how subsidies work as they are sometimes paid not to plant, told what to plant and subsidized for planting specific crops. They are well versed in how to play that game and how to achieve the best economic benefit from it. Are solar panels the solution to global warming? Hardly. Nor has much of what’s out there touted to change the weather ever resulted in the the reputed outcome. But let landowners take advantage of the rare opportunity to benefit from this one.
One thing that has come out in this that particularly scares me is the bonding or other means of providing for decommissioning of these installations at the end of their life. If we start down that path, where does it end? Drive around Marshall County and you will see abandoned silos, farm windmills, railroad beds on abandoned rail lines, railroad depots, grain elevators, former school buildings, houses, collapsing barns and unusable commercial buildings. That same argument could be used to say we should prevent any of those things happening again, but can you imagine the cost of construction if you had to plan/pay for end of life removal of EVERYTHING? Most construction puts significant funds at risk when the investment in these these things is made. The increased cost due to this increased risk would undoubtedly stop some expansions and new endeavors from happening. In the case of solar farms, you’re asking the companies involved to plan for the cost of removal 30 years from now. What does that look like and how would labor inflation costs balloon that? Building’s generally have lifespans of 2 to 4 times that. How does that even work!?
Again, I believe all of this amounts to spurious concerns, past the aesthetic issues. I’m not thrilled with the aesthetics of high voltage powerlines crisscrossing Marshall County, Those power lines are largely what makes Marshall County attractive to solar farms. But these things benefit my life. Stopping them means hurting other property owners and limiting their livelihoods. If we collectively care enough about stopping these things, then we should put our money where our mouth is and pool funds to purchase and control the property ourselves. Otherwise, be quiet and let progress move on…
Our Customers Say…
Ronald W Liechty - President, Garden Court, Inc.
Growing or Dying
January 27, 2025
Kevin Berger
Commentary, Marshall County, MCEDC, Politics, Rants
Community, Development, government, Rants, Trends
Years ago I was part of a group that went to New Bremen, Ohio. We went there as a delegation from the Culver Chamber of Commerce to meet with Jim Dicke II, to discuss how to turn around Culver and possibly get his assistance. Jim had been instrumental through his company, Crown Equipment, in revitalizing New Bremen. From that small group and the then Culver Chamber Board, the Culver Second Century Committee was born. (More on that another day.) One thing he said in that meeting has stuck with me over the years, “Communities are either growing or dying. There is no such thing as staying status quo.” (I don’t know if it was a personal statement or someone else’s, but I always attribute it to him.) I’ve repeated that over the years in multiple settings. I generally try and attribute it to Jim, but even when I don’t, I’m not too concerned, because it fits with one of my other favorite quotes, “Plagiarism is the Sincerest Form of Flattery.” Which I first saw in a B.C. Comic by Johnny Hart…
In this case, I am asking that question about Marshall County, as one of the first actions of the new County Commissioners was to enact a moratorium on projects that involve Solar Farms, Battery Storage Facilities, Carbon Capture and Data Centers. While I understand some of the arguments about Solar (though I don’t necessarily agree, I’ve discussed that here and here), I am particularly interested here in stopping Data Centers.
Data Centers have been protested in other areas for many reasons. One of them, NYMBYism, seems to be the main one behind these efforts. The protests are not coming from our Amish community, so most of the protestors have cell phones and use the internet. I assume they’re not against them as a concept. I also find that interesting coming from the Commissioners, some of whom have expressed their support for our new President, Donald Trump. In a January 7th press conference, President-elect Trump introduced an investor group, DAMAC, planning to bring $20 billion dollars in data center investment to the U.S. In the speech, he specifically called out Indiana as one of the places to benefit from this investment. Though apparently not Marshall County, per our moratorium.
The others reasons don’t seem to apply or could be controlled. There are complaints from other areas that they use too much power… but that’s what’s drawn them here… our somewhat unique position as a crossroads of power grids. Interestingly, the same reason that the solar farm developers have been drawn here, though for the opposite use, i.e. solar farms uploads power and data centers downloads power. The second complaint is excessive use of water, but that’s been mostly corrected and we don’t have a water shortage here. Also, in other areas they are concerned about the draw on existing water infrastructure, but this moratorium is in the County… which does not have a water system. The third complaint is potential pollution from back-up generators, but again, we’re on a major grid line and if that goes down, there’s a lot more to worry about than back-up generator exhaust! A couple of interesting resources here and here.
The main point here is that we seem to be moving towards an anti-development stance in the county. This despite a new national movement to reduce development impediments, Marshall County seems to be focused on setting up road blocks. I realize that some of this is grassroots, but that doesn’t mean it’s based in facts. It seems to be more based in NIMBYism and lack of knowledge. All of these things would increase our tax base, with minimum disruption to our communities. Yes, they should be researched and possibly controlled, but two years from now, we may lament being passed by.
While a data center wouldn’t employ a lot of people in the long term, it would generate jobs during construction. Once completed, it would be low impact on roads, i.e. no semi-traffic as with other manufacturing. Besides the building itself, they do not use up as much land. They are often taller than our general manufacturing construction, sometimes building 90 feet high. They don’t have larger numbers of regular employees, so no acres of asphalt parking lots. We already have setback requirements, impervious surface requirements and if we don’t want to give exceptions on heights, we have existing height restrictions.
But we currently have a moratorium. So what is our alternative? MCEDC has spearheaded three shell buildings in the past, with what seems to be great success. Are more on the horizon? The last one the building in the Plymouth Industrial park at the SE corner of Pioneer and Jim Neu Drive, which currently houses Divert. It has been occupied since 2022. Is there another in the works? Seems that there should be.
I don’t know what the answer is to the growth question. MCEDC is trying, but it’s hard to do without the County behind them and with headlines that make us seem anti-development. If the County Commissioners and County Council have another plan, I haven’t heard it yet. Hopefully they have something in mind. Because Communities are either growing or dying and I don’t think they want to preside over the latter.
Edit: Yesterday, January 28th, 2025, I attended the PIDCO Annual meeting. The guest speakers were from NIPSCO. The topic of data centers came up as well as wind & solar. Several things of note were mentioned that I thought were worth adding here:
0 comments