Indiana Regional Cities Forum
Through my position on the MCEDC (Marshall County Economic Development Corporation) board, I have met Regina Emberton, President and CEO of the Michiana Partnership. Michiana Partnership is a regional organization that includes Marshall County and they are involved with marketing our area.
She shared the forum information below regarding IEDC‘s (Indiana Economic Development Corporation) promotion of their Regional Cities Initiative. It’s not something I can attend, but I thought it was worth sharing here.
I truly believe the old adage that “A Rising Tide Lifts All Boats”. We need to work together as a region to grow our economy and our fate is at least peripherally tied to the success of South Bend/Mishawaka.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Living History Exhibit
A while back I wrote about my grandfather being interviewed by students from the Weidner School of Inquiry regarding his service in World War II. The exhibit at the Marshall County Museum that resulted from this is open. This is a flyer for the Open House a couple of weeks ago. That’s my grandfather as the poster boy for the event! Unfortunately my grandfather was recovering from double pneumonia at the time and didn’t get to attend. Stop by and check it out. My grandfather turned 100 this year. There are not many WWII veterans still around. We need to learn from them and remember them.
A Sagging Ridgeline
I visited a client last week who was asking about a portion of his home that had a sagging ridge line. The roof is also the style that has two different roof slopes along the rafters. It is an older home so my first thought was that it was not built using trusses and the rafters and or ridge beam was undersized. I asked to go inside to see what internal effect this was having and was somewhat surprised to find a room with a vaulted ceiling which did not follow the roof line at all! While this is not unusual and is often accomplished in current designs using a scissor truss, the age of the structure and the lack of a transfer of the exterior failure to the interior ceiling indicated this was not the case.
One of the advantages of a truss roof is that the roof load is transferred directly down on the perimeter walls. When properly designed, the loads in a rafter roof design transfer the loads down as well, but when the ridge beam is undersized, it will sag causing the rafters to exert lateral pressure on the perimeter walls. There weren’t any particular indications of this occurring. And then there is the puzzle of the vaulted ceiling. According the the owner, it was a later addition, so was a new ridge beam and rafter system put in below the roof to support the ceiling? Is the ceiling hanging from the roof beam and rafters? (Which would add to the stress on the roof.) Unfortunately I had to admit that my X-ray vision was not up to the task of determining the internal workings of the roof and ceiling situation.
In recent years, particularly with the installation of some of the new residential metal roofs, I’ve seen sagging roofs being hidden under new roofs. Sometimes this is accomplished using “sleeper” purlins that are shimmed to level the roof. In some extreme cases new rafters are cut to lay on the roof at the proper slopes to correct the problem. All too often I see this entire new system going on over the existing roofing. Some of the concerns here are:
- The failing roof is hidden and not corrected. Out of sight, out of mind is not a solution.
- The underlying failing roof is now under additional loading, potentially increasing the problem. While the metal roof can at times reduce the potential snow load since snow won’t stick to the metal like it does to shingles, it is still an increase of the day to day material load on the underlying structure.
- Often there is rot and deterioration associated with the sagging roof. Under the additional roof, it may continue to deteriorate unobserved potentially leading to failure.
But back to my client’s problem. I had to tell him that there wasn’t a quick fix. Due to the hidden problems, some selective demolition would be needed to determine a solution. That’s not generally something a client likes to hear, but it is the right thing to do.
Source: Sagging Ridge image borrowed from Prugar Consulting,Inc.
Source: Truss Load image borrowed from Next.cc
Culver Comp Plan Implementation Meeting
As a partial rebuttal to my own post yesterday, I attended the Culver Comprehensive Plan Implementation Meeting on Tuesday night. This meeting was held at the Depot and was part of Houseal Lavigne‘s contract for preparing the Comprehensive Plan. Several of us on the initial comprehensive plan steering committee requested that this be included in hopes that the seed would be planted with Town officials on why the plan needs to be a reference document and not something just completed and set aside on a shelf.
Here’s the partial rebuttal part… The Town Council, Plan Commission, Redevelopment Commission and Board of Zoning Appeals as well as the original Steering Committee were requested to attend. Drumroll please… 4 0f 5 Town Council members were there, 4 of 9 Plan Commission members were there, 3 of 5 Redevelopment Commission members were there and 2 of 5 Board of Zoning Appeal members were there. For Culver, that’s a damn fine turnout! It’s a partial rebuttal because this was the regular night for the Plan Commission and they also had a plat review on their agenda. There shouldn’t have been any issue getting a quorum there on their regular night!
Meeting Participation in Culver
Monday night I went to the regularly scheduled meeting of the Culver Redevelopment Commission at 5:00 at the Culver Town Hall. I arrived to find the door locked. I looked at the notice on the bulletin board and it stated that the regularly scheduled meeting had been changed to 4:00 and that they had added a joint meeting with the Town Council which they had moved to the Culver Library at 5:00.
As I’ve said here before I tend to cut volunteer board members a lot of slack. They give a lot of time and often only receive slings and arrows from the public in return. I don’t think that’s an excuse for making public participation difficult. My position as Culver’s representative on the Marshall County Economic Development Corporation Board means that my representation there is closely tied to the work the redevelopment commission does. I attend almost every meeting of the redevelopment commission. It is on my calendar to be there on the third Monday at 5:00. It frustrates me to no end when I make a special effort to be at a meeting only to find that they moved the meeting, with private discussion between meetings. I’m not special. They don’t have to let me know. But I think it’s disrespectful and says something about their relationship with MCEDC. While they have fulfilled the letter of the law by posting it on the bulletin board at the Town Hall I also feel it does a disservice to the community. There is also a page on that same bulletin board listing all of the regularly scheduled meetings. If someone other than myself had gone down to see when the next meeting was, read that list and didn’t check later to see that the meeting had been rescheduled they would have been standing out there fuming like myself.
