government

Culver Theater Thoughts

by

I’ve been to four meetings in the past few weeks where the Culver Theater was discussed. This is about the Culver Theater on Lake Shore Drive, not the former ones on Main Street. It has been through many reiterations and multiple names, but its days as a movie theater ended more than a decade ago under the weight of increasingly expensive film rental fees in an aging venue. Before it closed, it had weathered the onslaught of VHS rentals (remember Bick’s Flicks at 820 Academy Road?), but lost the battle to streaming services such as Netflix.

Tom Ruane, a Culver Academies grad, bought the property with a sense of nostalgia and a passion to bring it back to life. I met with Tom several times regarding his passion project. During one of those meetings I climbed through the rafters with him and at another, I and the contractor he had working there stood on the marquee, verifying that it was structurally sound. (The then Building Commissioner/Inspector didn’t agree due to some loose soffit.)

CMA Cadets lining up at the El Rancho Matinee

Tom had made a false start at a Not-For-Profit (NFP) to pull the project together that initially failed. His second pass at a Theater NFP did better and was moving the project forward when Tom tragically passed away in January of 2020. Tom’s vision for the future of the theater was a bit scattered, but it was based in his memories of visiting the theater as a Culver Cadet. The Saturday matinees were very popular as one of the few places a cadet could take a date and sit in the dark, relatively unsupervised! The theater was generally full, regardless of what was playing. Several other Culver Academies grads had also expressed an interest in Tom’s vision, so there was some financial backing. Tom invited me to be on the NFP board, but I chose to pass on that opportunity. Kudos to those who stepped up.

Tom’s untimely passing set the group back as the property was tied up in probate for a period of time. It’s finally been released to the NFP’s control. With that piece in place, the Culver Redevelopment Commission has chosen to support them in an READI grant application. This is for the Arts & Culture portion of READI. Marshall County Community Foundation (MCCF) will also be supporting this effort. Since it is Lilly Foundation money, the MCCF endorsement will carry weight.

The NFP is concentrating on the theater. They have had it reviewed by Indiana Landmarks, who deemed it old, but not historic. While having mixed feelings about that, it has released them to dream bigger and look at building new in lieu of trying to renovate. Their current plan is to create a multi-media venue similar to what the Rees Theatre in Plymouth has become. To accomplish this, they are requesting +/- 20′ in additional property to be donated to the theater from the adjacent Town of Culver parcel to the west. This would give them a building width of 50′. It wasn’t stated, but I assume they are going to extend the building to the north as well. There is some depth to gain towards the alley. They are not planning to extend above the 35′ height restriction, though if they follow through with a rooftop patio, they would need to accommodate an elevator/stair shaft extending above the roof line.

The Osborn Hotel at the NW corner of Ohio & Jefferson Streets

The Town of Culver has bigger plans and their READI application included money for the theater, but also included money for planning renovations all along the portion of Lake Shore Drive (LSD) adjacent to the Town Park and including in the Park. This falls under the most recent Comprehensive Plan recommendations to create an entertainment district in this area. One thing I thought interesting about this was their concern of not increasing the heights along this stretch of Lake Shore Drive. They will be limiting development and, to be somewhat mercenary, assessed value… This strikes me as odd since we have current buildings such as the First Farmers Bank & Trust building and The Cove exceeding that height restriction, they are planning a new Institutional zoning district for the Culver Academies that explicitly waives that height restriction because of the number of buildings they build higher, and even historical buildings from the past such as the Osborn Hotel were above that level.

I appreciate the Culver theater NFP’s enthusiasm, but I do have some concerns. The Rees Theater in Plymouth is a beautiful and popular venue, bringing entertainment and visitors to Plymouth on a regular basis. That said, it continues to struggle financially. There is no doubt that it is a resource for the City of Plymouth, but it’s sustainability is a concern. They had hoped to achieve an endowment capable of bridging this gap, but so far, that effort has stalled. While it is currently a fairly new facility, there will be maintenance & renovation requirements in the future, that they will be unable to save for if they are not viable on a self-supporting basis. That means they will be going back to the well to find donors to save it again. Culver’s Theater will be a smaller venue in a smaller community. Sustainability will be a challenge in the smaller market. The question in my mind isn’t whether this is a laudable thing to do that Culver will benefit from, but more to the point of whether they can fund an endowment on top of the construction costs that keeps the dream alive.

The funding won’t be the only challenge. Culver does an above average job of communication on new programs and changes. That can be a double-edged sword, as it allows the NIMBYs to organize and be vocal. If I had to guess, I would say that bringing the theater back is a typical 80/20 issue in Culver with 80% support. Despite that there are already naysayers from the adjacent condos to the north concerned about losing their view, others bemoaning the already strained parking situation on summer weekend evenings and still others begrudging the Town giving up any of the adjacent lot for the venture to another NFP. You would hope the majority would prevail, but the other voices will be heard. Even among the supporters, there is some misconception regarding the Town’s lot to the west, assuming that it could be used for theater parking. To date, the Town has always kept this lot reserved for the fire department, so there’s no reason to expect that to change… or to change without the fire department pitching a fit…

A few thoughts on the parking:

  1. Lake Shore Drive (LSD) is kind of a mess. The Right-of-Way (ROW) meanders and has an inconsistent width. While the GIS is likely off in some areas, it would appear there are encroachments. At a recent Redevelopment Commission meeting, infrastructure issues were alluded to. If major changes are in the works for LSD, parking could be examined at the same time. The width would allow some narrowing, possibly changing some of the parallel parking to angle parking or with the width, maybe some of the angle parking could become 90 degree parking. In either case, additional spaces may be achievable. Any narrowing of the traffic lanes would increase pedestrian safety as well. (One of the previous plans suggested consideration of a small round-a-bout at the bend in LSD at the entrance to the park to enhance safety and traffic control.)
  2. While the Town is encouraging biking through the addition of the trails, very little is being done with biking infrastructure in the LSD or Main Street shopping areas. A few bike racks could encourage bike use, freeing up spaces.
  3. The Town sells 800+ golf cart permits each year. The funds from those permits could be used to create some golf cart spaces throughout the LSD area. There are creative ways to do this. One suggestion would be to turn some of the parallel parking into angle golf cart parking. This would be a two or three to one gain in parking spaces Just turning the end of aisle space in an angle parking or 90 degree parking space into two stacked golf cart spaces would be positive.
  4. I know this would be a tough sell with the fire department, but the existing lot configuration is inefficient. The lot could be reconfigured to have more spaces and still have designated fire fighter parking for emergencies. They could be allowed to block it off for events and truck maintenance while allowing the theater, restaurants and Park to gain spaces that currently sit vacant +90% of the time.

So, if you follow me here, you know I like to think outside the box. Here’s a more radical idea if the theater fails to gain traction on Lake Shore Drive. The Town wants the theater torn down, so the existing structure will be gone, one way or another. What if the theater group is unsuccessful there? Would they consider continuing the mission to provide an entertainment venue? Would they consider the preservation of another historic building? In the current Culver real estate market, the lot the theater sits on would sell for a stupid amount of money. The condo owners to the north would bid it up, just to keep it empty. Another developer would no doubt look at a multi story building with condos and maybe a bit of first floor retail. That could be seed money to do something else. What could that something else be?

Take a look at the Wesley United Methodist Church on School Street. As with many modern Methodist Churches, the congregation suffered a schism over a divergence is their beliefs. As with many of the Churches in Culver, Wesley United Methodist Church was already struggling with membership attrition, which was only exacerbated by the split. Is this a chance to save this Church before it lands on Indiana Landmarks Sacred Places list? Constructed in the 50’s (by Easterday Construction!), it is an iconic Culver fixture that should be preserved.

The building is in relatively good condition. Aside from the Sanctuary, which could continue its life as a public gathering space, it also includes a secondary entertainment area in the basement where there has been a stage as well. It has a large, working kitchen, an elevator to access both floors, and many ancillary classrooms and offices that could be repurposed. It sits on wide streets with ample parking and for larger events, it sits a block away from the school parking lots to the north and south. If the venue is successful, College Avenue is wide enough to convert some of the parking to angle parking for additional spaces and the Church owns a vacant lot to the north that could be converted to parking as well.

This takes it away from being in the “Entertainment District”, but in some ways, that’s not a bad thing. The location is easily accessible and does not carry the same parking issues that LSD has. The Church building would be preserved, The Church congregation would no longer have the crushing maintenance issues above and beyond those necessary for the congregation size and thus, would have funds available for growth and pursuit of their mission.

I realize this idea will be scoffed at and likely ridiculed, not in the least by the current Wesley United Methodist Church members, but it is mainly an exercise in looking at options and not being too tightly tied to just one solution. Being fixated on an original idea, can sometimes become debilitating, when there may be more than one solution.

I hope the theater is successful in some form and figures out the sustainability issue. The revival of the theater has been high on the list of surveys done for recent comprehensive plans, and the Stellar efforts. It is good that it is getting some attention, whether it comes to fruition or not.

Who should organize Culver?

by

There was an interesting discussion at the Culver Redevelopment Commission (CRC) last Thursday about potentially hiring someone to coordinate the various volunteer efforts in town. At one point the Town Manager referenced my post: Culver needs an Infrastructure Czar, saying that he felt this was a similar situation where Culver has lots of volunteers, often with the same people on different committees, but there was no coordinated effort. Years ago, this was the reason the Culver Second Century Committee was created… to coordinate all of the volunteer efforts. This sounds similar, but with paid staff. Can’t believe I haven’t written the story of the Second Century Committee, so I’ll put that on my list of things to do here. (Done!) It was basically started as an off-shoot of the Culver Chamber of Commerce in order to coordinate the volunteer effort of the various Culver Not-For-Profits. It flourished and morphed, but eventually became defunct over time.

One board member spoke about the success of the Culver Stellar Committee and then Marshall County Stellar Committee (Marshall County Crossroads), but then expressed disappointment that the offshoots, the Culver Crossroads Committee and the One Marshall County Committee haven’t moved projects forward post Stellar. Her take-away was the need for paid staff to direct the volunteers and keep people on task. This is the route One Marshall County is pursuing, while Culver Crossroads basically hasn’t met since completing the new (2024) Culver Comprehensive Plan.

I think the discussion was good, but I think there was a point missed about why the Stellar committees succeeded and the follow-up committees are failing. In my opinion, despite labeling themselves as committees, both the town and county Stellar groups were actually task forces. A Task Force by definition is a temporary group created to deal with a specific issue, usually made up of people chosen for their knowledge or experience in the subject. This is a key difference, since with a task force, there are defined goals and a deadline or deadlines to meet those goals. With a deadline, there comes a sense of urgency. This is what the Culver and Marshall County Stellar groups were.

I liked a lot of the points made at the CRC, such as reducing the number of meetings and organizing the various groups to keep them focused on common tasks. (When I was on the chamber board, we talked about “The 10 people that do everything…”. They were generally involved in all the various organizations, often in leadership positions, until their time was stretched, their efforts were diluted and they eventually burnt out and disappeared.) But… A town employee doing this is expansion of bureaucracy and most of us know that this could easily become the camel’s nose under the tent. My experience is that bureaucracies tend to be more about self-preservation than accomplishing things. I look at the City of Plymouth that had an engineering consultant a couple of decades ago, which became a full-time engineer, which became a full-time engineer with an assistant engineer, which became a full-time engineer and assistant engineer, farming work out to an engineering consultant. All with little change to the City of Plymouth population. Metrics of what success looks like as well as deadlines for that success are critical in my opinion. Mission creep isn’t automatically bad, but needs to be controlled and subject to oversight and approval.

From a serial volunteer’s perspective, I know committees tend to talk things to death and committee members that volunteer to do something are easily side-tracked by work, family and general life obligations. If Stellar committee (task force) items weren’t completed, well and on time, the Stellar reward was off the table. There was a sense of urgency that a standing committee rarely, if ever, feels. It takes a special employee to maintain that urgency on a consistent basis.

It will be interesting to watch how this plays out. If the town does pursue this, I hope they find that special employee.

Arbitrary and Capricious Fees

by
Letter to Culver Town Council

I just received the billing for this year’s Fire Protection Sprinkler System fee for Sand Hill Farm Apartments in Culver. I have discussed this fee here and here in the past. Despite protesting the initial basis for this fee, and the proposed increase during budget season, an 83% increase was passed.

The previous cost, $1,203.81 + sales tax was excessive and unjustified. The 83% increase to $2,198.98 + sales tax is nearly twice as onerous! There is no inspection or scheduled inspections, no maintenance, and no record-keeping. The only justification given is the cost of bringing water to the site, which the municipality would do anyway for residential service. Reasonably, water usage for a fire in a building with sprinkler system would be significantly less than that used to fight a fire using traditional methods, since fire sprinklers generally put out the interior source before the building is engulfed. I’ll just skip over the whole idea of why there’s sales tax applied, other than to ask, what is being purchased?!

In the United States we have a generally progressive income tax system where individuals are taxed more when they make more. Conversely, we often have regressive fees that disproportionately hit the lower end of the income level. Culver’s Fire Protection Sprinkler System fee is an example of a regressive fee. There are not that many buildings with fire protection sprinkler systems in Culver, but those that do have it vary widely in size. A one-size-fits-all per building fee doesn’t take this into account. Of the buildings being affected by this fee, five of them are residential and subject to some form of rent control. Since there was a rather large rate increase to the water bill passed at the same time, this puts these lower income residents subject to a double hit.

7-24-25 email to Council President

Culver recently adjusted building permits. They were changed from a because-we-can high rate to a cost-of-service rate, justified by time tracking completed by the Culver Building Commissioner. This is a much more reasonable and defensible way of determining fees. If this were applied to the Fire Protection Service System fee, it would likely be zeroed out.

In the current Town Council’s defense, the water service fees have been left unchanged too long across the board, resulting in a larger than average increase. The blame for that lies on previous councils. That said, it’s not appropriate to hit the most vulnerable in the town’s population with an extra fee just to save a few cents on everyone’s water bills as the new fee structure is rolled out.

All the Talk of Housing Costs

by

I listen to all the talk on how to reduce housing costs from government officials and am amused and disheartened by the lack of industry involvement and thus understanding of the industry by those proposing cures. Much of the discussion is similar to the other conversations on inflation. (I gave some thoughts on inflation here.) Locally, I have been involved with Jack Davis’s Faith Based Housing Committee, the UWMC Housing Matters group, MACOG’s Marshall County Housing Study, One Marshall County’s Housing & Infrastructure Committee and the newly formed Marshall County Community Development Corporation (MCCDC) of which I’m a board member. Back before this I was on Culver’s Entry Level Housing Committee and the MC Crossroads Housing Committee. In all of these meetings, I can only name one other person from the construction industry, no others from the development industry and only a two or three from the rental industry that have been included. The unfortunate thing is that the industry has been blamed in some of these meetings, making it harder to ask them to consider participation.

The general theory is that the reason for the higher housing costs is all due to scarcity. The study done for the Housing Matters group came up with a deficit of 1,300 dwelling units for Marshall County. There is no doubt that scarcity is a factor, but more housing isn’t the panacea. Assuming costs are totally contingent on demand assumes that housing building contractors are taking advantage and price gouging because they can. In most situations, that is not the case. There are underlying inflation costs that have caused material and labor costs to spiral up. This is a problem that travels up from the bottom of the material supply chain. At a certain point, if demand starts to be satisfied, the incentive to build new housing goes away.

There are couple of other effects that seem to be overlooked. The first of these is the increase in property values. It is often stated in these meetings, that more new housing will make existing housing stock more affordable. Sounds good right? Until you’re the existing homeowner hoping to profit from your home sale. If some of these plans are successful, some who have counted on their home’s value appreciation will see a reduction in their net worth. The second effect is how this will affect property taxes for the county and municipalities. These governmental entities, while understanding the challenge to potential homeowners, have benefited from the increase in property values. While this is tempered by homestead exemptions, it has still been a net benefit as commercial residential property is affected as well.

The bursting of the housing bubble in 2008 has contributed to this problem as well. As so often happens, the pendulum has swung from the easy credit days back then to credit tightening to theoretically prevent another bubble. Homeowners need to show more steady income. Commercial residential developers/builders have to do the same, meeting a higher income to debt service ratio to satisfy lenders.

Add to these things, all of the new energy codes, safety standards and zoning hurdles and you find that building new homes is not always an easy prospect. Locally, there are attempts underway to start a land bank, streamline processes and in some cases provide short-term, low-interest loans. On the national scale, there are ideas bandied about such as 50 year mortgages, releasing government land for home construction and making down payments on a home something you can take from and/or hold in your 401(k) plan. All are interesting ideas, but not necessarily things that will make an immediate difference or be proven to be correct responses quickly.

I don’t see this problem going away quickly. Some of the “solutions” may result in unintended consequences. As is often the case, it may be best to let the market figure it out over time, but to the extent that it can be solved externally, I don’t think it will happen without all the players around the same table.