I’ve been a fan of Science Fiction since Grandma Berger gave me a Tom Swift Jr. book in grade school. I think it was an impulse purchase on her part as I can’t imagine her as a sci-fi fan. That first Tom Swift book was an old book when I read it. Part of the fascination with it was reading what the book presented as fantasy juxtaposed against those same things coming to life in the real world in which I was living. In any case, I was hooked.
It seems to me that most scientists would be fans of science fiction as well. Look at Sheldon, Leonard, Raj & Howard on the Big Bang Theory… Ha! But on the more sober side, do you think scientists ever think about the cautionary science fiction tales as they strive to bring those fantasies to life?
This article by Judy Schriener titled “Will Self-Assembling Robots Slide into the Construction Industry?” makes me wonder. Isaac Asimov first presented The Three Laws of Robots in a 1942 short story titled, “Run Around”. Some of you may be familiar with them from the recent Will Smith movie version of another of Asimov’s books, “I, Robot”. For those of you unfamiliar, here they are in their original form:
* Laws and timelines taken from a wikipedia article title Three Laws of Robotics.
Well, here we are suffering through DST (Daylight Savings Time) again. While “Falling Back” isn’t a traumatic as “Springing Forward”, I still prefer leaving things alone. I used to think Indiana was progressive for not participating. That was confirmed when I lived under DST for a few years in Georgia that pretty much confirmed my feelings, so I was pretty vocally against the change when it happened.
I ran across an article by an economist, Allison Schrager, titled: “The US needs to retire daylight savings and just have two time zones—one hour apart” I learned a few things including how little of the world observes DST. The cool map above is from her site. The Wikipedia link to Daylight Savings Time above shows a map that indicates large portions of the globe that did observe DST no longer do so.
Depiction of the large scale WECS’s that the Concerned Citizens protested at the County Level
Representatives from the Concerned Property Owners of Marshall County requested that Culver change their zoning ordinance regarding WECS’s and as a result, the Culver Plan Commission held a Public Hearing on an ordinance change at their August 2013 meeting. (WECS is the acronym for Wind Energy Conversion Systems and applies to any device that takes wind energy and converts it to usable forms of energy.) The initial request was for Culver to match the County’s zoning requirements which currently bans commercial WECS’s and allows residential systems with a Special Use Permit in selective zoning districts. Unfortunately audience members requested that the ordinance be tweaked to further restrict residential systems as well. At that time I spoke up and reminded the Plan Commission that they had recently created an A1 – Agricultural District with the intention of mirroring Marshall County’s A1 district. This was done to eliminate discrepancy protests to extending our Territorial Authority. The Commission agreed with my argument but still had some reservation so they decided to table the issue.
At the September Culver Plan Commission meeting the topic came up again. Russ Mason, Building Commissioner, had conversations with some farmers and had made some minor tweaks to the height restrictions for WECS’s. Audience members also spoke up and protested the allowance of WECS’s in residential areas even under the special use requirements. I again spoke up with two points:
Last night was the Vision Workshop for the Culver Comprehensive Plan. I’ve been calling this effort 20/20 vision for Culver for a while now. Unfortunately with the poor turn out last night, our vision may require a stronger prescription! Less than 30 people turned out for last night’s meeting. That’s pretty dismal. There were three Plan Commission members there, but only one Redevelopment Commission member and no Town Council members. The overall poor attendance is probably due to poor advertising, but it’s unfortunate that our community leaders aren’t getting involved. I’m not in tune with all of the local groups, but I was disappointed that only one Chamber board member was there who was also the only Second Century Committee board member. That was particularly disappointing considering the leadership role SCC took in the previous Comprehensive Plan. I couldn’t identify any of the Lions Club Board, Kiwanis Board, Boys & Girls Club Board, etc. Maybe that apathy in and of itself says a lot about Culver’s future…