Historic Window Follow-up

It seems appropriate that I give a little rebuttal to the story I reprinted last week on historic windows (here).  I’m a supporter of Indiana Landmarks.  I can’t argue that preserving old windows is a green solution.  Keeping them out of landfills is just one example of this.  Unfortunately there are other issues.

It’s worth noting that Daniel tested old windows with storm windows installed.  Many older windows don’t have storm windows and some that do have storm windows that fit poorly.  It’s also worth noting that he was testing glass to glass.  I think he’s right that the extra air space between the inside window glass and the storm window glass made a difference.  Most of the new window manufacturers will tell you the same thing.

But a window is an assembly, not just the glass.  Daniel might have gotten different results if he had tested around the perimeter.  New windows have thermal blocks to prevent heat transfer which old windows do not.  He might have gotten different results if he had tested around the outside of the trim.  New windows don’t have ballasts or their associated cavities in the walls.  When we install new windows we fill those voids with insulation which is nearly impossible to do with a window in place in a finished wall.

And one more thing about storm windows…  They generally come down in the Spring and don’t go back up until Fall so we can enjoy the fresh air.  Heat transfer is just as important in the heat of the summer when the air conditioner is running.

Old Window with cracking Lead Paint

Another big issue with old windows is lead paint.  I attended a lead safety course and they emphasized that old windows with lead paint were a prime producer of lead dust.  The old double hung windows are often painted on the sides of the sash as well as in the window frame track.  Friction across these painted surfaces as the windows are raised and lowered produce lead dust which is easily inhaled, absorbed or ingested if it gets near food.  Stripping an old window such as the one in the picture to the right is a time consuming and expensive process, particularly when lead safety practices are observed.Window location is also important.  New building standards require tempered glass when glass is installed less than 18″ above the floor or adjacent to stairs.  Older windows are exempt from this requirement, but that doesn’t make the safety issue that caused the rule to be promulgated go away.

There is also the issue of seals.  We’ve all seen old double hung windows with foam stuffed into the joint between the sashes to prevent air infiltration.  New double hung windows have seals at those cross points.  Even with those, they can’t compare with new casement windows that have the locking mechanism that pulls the sash tight against the seal.

All in all, there are some benefits to salvaging old windows.  New windows never provide the same look or have the authentic trim.  Often it is cost prohibitive to install new windows with true divided lights.  There are many reasons to preserve historic windows.  It’s important to understand all the cons that go along with the pros though.

Are Old Windows More Efficient Than New?

Daniel Linley of Elkhart won Indiana Landmarks’ Servaas Memorial Award for his project proving the superior energy efficiency of vintage windows over modern ones.

A window salesman’s pitch put Daniel Linley on a quest to prove that new windows would be more energy efficient than old windows. But in his six-grade science fair project at Pinewood Elementary the old windows won, and so did Daniel’s project – at the school, local and regional levels. Daniel also took home the Servaas Memorial Award and accompanying $1,000 prize from Indiana Landmarks.  Read the rest of this article at the Indiana Landmarks website here.

“I wanted my science project to be relevant, something that people would care about. Anyone can add more baking soda to a volcano to make a bigger boom.” Daniel says.

Tony Bennett

Dr. Tony Bennett
State Superintendent

I had the opportunity to hear State Superintendent of Schools, Dr. Tony Bennett, speak last week at the State Board meeting of Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC) in Indianapolis.  It was interesting to hear the changes that he and Governor Daniels have made in the Indiana school systems over the past few years.  While it had a campaign speech theme, I was pleased and impressed with a lot of the questions and answers that followed.  Through my association with the Marshall County Economic Development Corporation, MCEDC, I constantly hear that educating the workforce is the number one request from the business community.  Dr. Bennett said that graduation rates are up 4%, and 10% more students are participating in Advanced Placement in preparation for college from 2009 to 2011.

 

As it affects our industry, I was more interested in how schools can earn credit for vocational education.  This has long been a frustration of mine.  I’ve often felt that high schools have divided the students into two tracks, 1) College Prep and 2) High School Graduation.  Track 1 kids are prepared for higher learning and are made to understand that high school is just a step along the way.  Less than three months after high school graduation they will be back in school and expected to continue their career path education.  Track 2 kids are given the goal of getting their high school diploma.  I feel that it often hasn’t been explained to them that they will still be expected to “learn” in order to make whatever job they take into a career.  Kids that we hire are often shocked and almost offended that we would suggest that they need to participate in Apprenticeship programs and continue their education in order to advance with our company.

For years now, ABC has offered a program to our schools that allows high school students participating in the Building Trades programs to earn their first year of apprenticeship.  The program is Bureau of Apprenticeship Training (BAT) approved, meaning that they could continue their training through union or merit shop training after graduation.  I think this accomplishes a three things:  1)  It fosters the idea that construction workers need to be educated in order to make their job a career.  2)  It gives the students a leg-up on the competition when they enter the job market.  3)  It elevates a graduate’s pay potential.  (They would still need to complete On the Job Training (OJT’s) hours to complete their first year, but the programs are set up with graduated pay increases with each year of apprenticeship successfully completed.  At Easterday Construction, we generally require a year of service before we would consider sending someone to Apprenticeship Training, but if someone came out of a high school building trades program with a year of apprenticeship under their belt, I would seriously consider sending them for year two the following Fall.)  I have approached the Culver and Plymouth Schools regarding this opportunity in the past and I have been rebuffed.  Hopefully they will reconsider this in the future since it would now count favorably in the school’s overall assessment by the State.

All in all, I was impressed with Dr. Bennett and the programs he has put into place.  I think Indiana could do worse than giving Dr. Bennett another term to further his programs and give the ones currently implemented a chance to bear fruit.