I’ve defended the Town of Culver in the past when people say things happen without enough notice or public input. From the 2014 Comprehensive Plan, to four times Culver participated in Stellar planning through the housing expansion with READI, Culver has been pretty forthcoming with community input and requests for participation and input. In the past couple of years there has been some changes of this and a recent visit to the Culver Town Council meeting highlighted this.
I used to attend the Council meetings on a regular basis, but with our main projects under construction in Plymouth, it became a choice of where to spend my evenings in the most productive manner. (The change to Thursday meetings in lieu of Tuesday meetings wasn’t helpful either…) Where Public Input used to be at the end of the meeting, there is now a Public Dialogue item towards the beginning with the following admonishment: This is an opportunity for the Council to open discussions with the public concerning items on the agenda. Unlike the public concern section, these conversations will be within an open format monitored by the President to ensure no one individual dominates the discussion or misdirects away from the specific topic.
I don’t think this change just occurred last month, but it is a recent change. It causes a few concerns for me. 1) This puts the opportunity for public input before there is any business conducted by the board. This means if you want to comment on something that occurred, you would need to come back at the next meeting for an opportunity to speak and, technically, per the admonishment above, request to be placed on the agenda. 2) Acknowledging that the privilege was occasionally was abused in the past, the intent of this seems to be to stifle audience input in other parts of the meeting. I have not been going often enough to speak to how this is operating, but reading that statement would make me less likely to raise my hand during board debate.
Lord knows, I have sat through council meetings where they have dragged due to prolonged audience interruptions, but I also know that there have been countless meetings where audience input has provided salient points that rightly affect the deliberation of the council. I always give deference to elected officials, who are essentially volunteers, stepping up to make a difference. But winning an election does not automatically make you an expert in all things. There are almost always community members with specialized expertise in things under discussion, if not specific experience with the issue under discussion that’s happening in their neighborhood.
I did note significantly fewer audience members than my experience in the past. Limiting input will have that effect. This will limit audience attendance to those that have a specific issue before the board, which was the reason I attended. In my opinion, this will not only limit input, but also the dissemination of information in the community.
This is not the only instance of this kind of change. There is another trend towards fewer community member populated subcommittees in favor of more direction from staff, appointed positions and elected officials. Community help such as this has been terminated in favor of more control. Community volunteer groups are experiencing more skeptical scrutiny than support. This is likely just another case of the pendulum swinging, and as often happens in government, it results in an over correction in the opposite direction. Hopefully we’re near the peak of the swing towards the control side and we start back in the other direction soon. I don’t think much is being intentionally hidden. I think it’s being justified for expediency. I would like to see things move back towards inclusiveness soon. I think collaboration with the citizens produces some of the best results, as shown from the Stellar experience.
We had the ribbon cutting for Water Street Town homes (WST) last Friday, May 15th. Julie Heise and Heather Martis did a great job with balloons, snacks and drinks for the event. There was a good turnout with members of the City Council, Redevelopment Commission and other officials there. The Mayor manned the big scissors to cut the ribbon and said a few words. Everything was positive! (Press Release here.)
All projects present challenges, but ones like these with multiple funding sources and their associated requirements are each unique. This one also involved multiple property owners, both public and private.
Above and beyond the general goals of providing work for our employees and not losing money, there are a myriad of other goals for a project like this. A few of these include: Downtown Revitalization, Work Force Housing, fulfilling comp plan goals and generally contributing to the health of downtown Plymouth. We participated in the two Marshall County housing studies, the Plymouth Comprehensive Plan committee and the Plymouth Zoning Review committee as we worked up to this. We’re still helping with the Zoning Review and have also joined the board of the Marshall County Community Development Corporation. All this to say we understand the issues.
We are pleased when we are able to do a project like this and also provide jobs for local subcontractors. A few of the local subcontractors for this project were: Langfeldt Excavating, Hundt Concrete, Banner Electric, MLE Roofing, Artizan Flooring, ARC Security, Rogers Landscaping and Quality Drywall. Scheduling has become the biggest issue with projects such as these, and having local access to local offices makes this easier. (Easier, not easy…)
Almost all municipalities are welcoming to developers at the elected official level during initial conversations, but it’s the follow-through that makes a difference. Nearly across the board, the various City of Plymouth departments understood the goals and attempted to make things easier to achieve them. This is not always the case. Water Street Townhomes had a sister project in Culver, Spirit Townhomes, that was also included in the Regional READI application, but after initial municipal interest, support evaporated. (A missed opportunity…) I would recommend talking to the City of Plymouth and Mayor Listenberger, if you’re considering a new development in Marshall County.
Water Street Townhomes is an example of urban renew at it’s best. It took two older homes and an underutilized parking lot on the back side of the main downtown street and created new commercial space (already filled), new housing that’s walkable to downtown merchants, entertainment, restaurants and the park, and took a poorly laid out parking lot which paid no taxes and turned it into a tax-paying development… while still adding 18 parking spaces and better stormwater control to the space. The parking lot was paved before returning it to the city. The adjacent alley was improved and new street lights were installed. Hopefully the project is an example of what can be done with public/private cooperation.
The internet trolls have been out in force, complaining that WST is not affordable housing (it was never advertised to be in an affordable housing program), it’s built in a flood plain (it’s not), it takes away public parking (it does not), it displaced existing residents (the existing houses were purchased privately at the seller’s asking prices), it’s ugly (Sorry… there’s no accounting for taste), it’s gentrification (okay, but maybe that’s the point?) and my favorite, for which I don’t even have a pithy retort, “We don’t want no new people”. It’s clear they know more than we do <sarcasm>, so there’s no point in addressing them. It’s still disheartening, when you’re trying to do something positive.
We’re still having some website issues. There were some pictures to include here, but they won’t upload. They may get added in a future update.
Land ownership has always been seen as a sign of permanence and investment in the community and in the political structures from municipality to county to state and all of the way up to the country as a whole. Article 1 of the Constitution pushed voting determination back to the States, and in the early elections, many States made land ownership a prerequisite to voting. Even now, investment in property is considered a goal. Individually, the dream of home ownership is a goal for most people. Municipalities tend to favor homeowners over renters, understanding that investing in a property in their jurisdiction brings community involvement, pride and often other types of investment.
That said, it’s disheartening to see the erosion of personal property rights. Zoning Ordinances by nature apply some of these restrictions for what’s perceived to be the greater good, but they attempt to guide by best practices, and are required by law to have public review, public input and an appeals process. This has been long established, but in the past, has been fairly lenient unless someone is being harmed. That process is becoming more intrusive and is coming after property owners in other ways, imposing taxes, fines and moratoriums.
Case #1 – Locally, there was discussion at a Culver Redevelopment Commission meeting and at the Downtown Strategies meeting about imposing fines on property owners in the commercial districts that do not have operating commercial businesses. (I mentioned this in a previous post, here.) Part of the argument given was, storage is not allowed in the commercial districts and a building just housing boxes without some from of retail offering was a violation of the Zoning Ordinance. I would have to assume, even if the building was purchased on a speculative basis, the owner would be happy to have an income producing business in there if they had that opportunity. The buildings in question are not being rented out as storage, but have the building owner’s own material there.
Case #2 – At the County level, there is an election flier floating around with a couple of lines that seems to be pretty contradictory:
Fought to Protect 12,000 Acres of Farm Ground from Industrial Solar.
Defended Property Owners from Gov’t Over-reach!
How is telling a farmer/landowner that they can only use their land to harvest corn & beans, in lieu of harvesting solar energy, not government over-reach?
Case #3 – And then there’s the current news headline from New York City, where the Mayor has decided to charge additional tax, gussied up as a pied-a-terre tax, on second homes worth over $5MM. This one and the Culver one seem awfully similar, since in both cases the building is zoned correctly, but the powers-that-be, don’t like the use or lack of use the current owner is pursuing. In NYC, what is that going to do to property values? I would have to assume every property currently valued at $5MM just dropped in value to $4.9MM. But wait, I forgot, the property owner has no control over what value is assessed. They’ll just lose money when the property sells…
In all of these cases, the stated goals are to promote the greater good. And as mentioned above, there is usually a required appeals process. In the cases above, there are no clear paths toward appeal. (What is the appeal process when a moratorium has been declared?) So the harmed individuals would be forced to pursue some form of civil remedy, which will undoubtedly be costly to the landowner and the governing body… but of course, the governing body is making demands and backing them up with other people’s money. The rule makers have no skin in the game…
On a grander scale, this is why our Founding Fathers set up the United States as a Republic and not a Democracy. Despite that, in the local trenches, government tends to lean more towards democracy, where politicians make decisions with their finger in the wind. Democracy tends to allow the majority to run over the minority. The individual property owner is always in the minority when it comes to how they want to use their property. That is very personal. It seems the individual property owner is falling victim to the vocal “majority” more and more.
I’ve been to four meetings in the past few weeks where the Culver Theater was discussed. This is about the Culver Theater on Lake Shore Drive, not the former ones on Main Street. It has been through many reiterations and multiple names, but its days as a movie theater ended more than a decade ago under the weight of increasingly expensive film rental fees in an aging venue. Before it closed, it had weathered the onslaught of VHS rentals (remember Bick’s Flicks at 820 Academy Road?), but lost the battle to streaming services such as Netflix.
Tom Ruane, a Culver Academies grad, bought the property with a sense of nostalgia and a passion to bring it back to life. I met with Tom several times regarding his passion project. During one of those meetings I climbed through the rafters with him and at another, I and the contractor he had working there stood on the marquee, verifying that it was structurally sound. (The then Building Commissioner/Inspector didn’t agree due to some loose soffit.)
CMA Cadets lining up at the El Rancho Matinee
Tom had made a false start at a Not-For-Profit (NFP) to pull the project together that initially failed. His second pass at a Theater NFP did better and was moving the project forward when Tom tragically passed away in January of 2020. Tom’s vision for the future of the theater was a bit scattered, but it was based in his memories of visiting the theater as a Culver Cadet. The Saturday matinees were very popular as one of the few places a cadet could take a date and sit in the dark, relatively unsupervised! The theater was generally full, regardless of what was playing. Several other Culver Academies grads had also expressed an interest in Tom’s vision, so there was some financial backing. Tom invited me to be on the NFP board, but I chose to pass on that opportunity. Kudos to those who stepped up.
Tom’s untimely passing set the group back as the property was tied up in probate for a period of time. It’s finally been released to the NFP’s control. With that piece in place, the Culver Redevelopment Commission has chosen to support them in an READI grant application. This is for the Arts & Culture portion of READI. Marshall County Community Foundation (MCCF) will also be supporting this effort. Since it is Lilly Foundation money, the MCCF endorsement will carry weight.
The NFP is concentrating on the theater. They have had it reviewed by Indiana Landmarks, who deemed it old, but not historic. While having mixed feelings about that, it has released them to dream bigger and look at building new in lieu of trying to renovate. Their current plan is to create a multi-media venue similar to what the Rees Theatre in Plymouth has become. To accomplish this, they are requesting +/- 20′ in additional property to be donated to the theater from the adjacent Town of Culver parcel to the west. This would give them a building width of 50′. It wasn’t stated, but I assume they are going to extend the building to the north as well. There is some depth to gain towards the alley. They are not planning to extend above the 35′ height restriction, though if they follow through with a rooftop patio, they would need to accommodate an elevator/stair shaft extending above the roof line.
The Osborn Hotel at the NW corner of Ohio & Jefferson Streets
The Town of Culver has bigger plans and their READI application included money for the theater, but also included money for planning renovations all along the portion of Lake Shore Drive (LSD) adjacent to the Town Park and including in the Park. This falls under the most recent Comprehensive Plan recommendations to create an entertainment district in this area. One thing I thought interesting about this was their concern of not increasing the heights along this stretch of Lake Shore Drive. They will be limiting development and, to be somewhat mercenary, assessed value… This strikes me as odd since we have current buildings such as the First Farmers Bank & Trust building and The Cove exceeding that height restriction, they are planning a new Institutional zoning district for the Culver Academies that explicitly waives that height restriction because of the number of buildings they build higher, and even historical buildings from the past such as the Osborn Hotel were above that level.
I appreciate the Culver theater NFP’s enthusiasm, but I do have some concerns. The Rees Theater in Plymouth is a beautiful and popular venue, bringing entertainment and visitors to Plymouth on a regular basis. That said, it continues to struggle financially. There is no doubt that it is a resource for the City of Plymouth, but it’s sustainability is a concern. They had hoped to achieve an endowment capable of bridging this gap, but so far, that effort has stalled. While it is currently a fairly new facility, there will be maintenance & renovation requirements in the future, that they will be unable to save for if they are not viable on a self-supporting basis. That means they will be going back to the well to find donors to save it again. Culver’s Theater will be a smaller venue in a smaller community. Sustainability will be a challenge in the smaller market. The question in my mind isn’t whether this is a laudable thing to do that Culver will benefit from, but more to the point of whether they can fund an endowment on top of the construction costs that keeps the dream alive.
The funding won’t be the only challenge. Culver does an above average job of communication on new programs and changes. That can be a double-edged sword, as it allows the NIMBYs to organize and be vocal. If I had to guess, I would say that bringing the theater back is a typical 80/20 issue in Culver with 80% support. Despite that there are already naysayers from the adjacent condos to the north concerned about losing their view, others bemoaning the already strained parking situation on summer weekend evenings and still others begrudging the Town giving up any of the adjacent lot for the venture to another NFP. You would hope the majority would prevail, but the other voices will be heard. Even among the supporters, there is some misconception regarding the Town’s lot to the west, assuming that it could be used for theater parking. To date, the Town has always kept this lot reserved for the fire department, so there’s no reason to expect that to change… or to change without the fire department pitching a fit…
A few thoughts on the parking:
Lake Shore Drive (LSD) is kind of a mess. The Right-of-Way (ROW) meanders and has an inconsistent width. While the GIS is likely off in some areas, it would appear there are encroachments. At a recent Redevelopment Commission meeting, infrastructure issues were alluded to. If major changes are in the works for LSD, parking could be examined at the same time. The width would allow some narrowing, possibly changing some of the parallel parking to angle parking or with the width, maybe some of the angle parking could become 90 degree parking. In either case, additional spaces may be achievable. Any narrowing of the traffic lanes would increase pedestrian safety as well. (One of the previous plans suggested consideration of a small round-a-bout at the bend in LSD at the entrance to the park to enhance safety and traffic control.)
While the Town is encouraging biking through the addition of the trails, very little is being done with biking infrastructure in the LSD or Main Street shopping areas. A few bike racks could encourage bike use, freeing up spaces.
The Town sells 800+ golf cart permits each year. The funds from those permits could be used to create some golf cart spaces throughout the LSD area. There are creative ways to do this. One suggestion would be to turn some of the parallel parking into angle golf cart parking. This would be a two or three to one gain in parking spaces Just turning the end of aisle space in an angle parking or 90 degree parking space into two stacked golf cart spaces would be positive.
I know this would be a tough sell with the fire department, but the existing lot configuration is inefficient. The lot could be reconfigured to have more spaces and still have designated fire fighter parking for emergencies. They could be allowed to block it off for events and truck maintenance while allowing the theater, restaurants and Park to gain spaces that currently sit vacant +90% of the time.
So, if you follow me here, you know I like to think outside the box. Here’s a more radical idea if the theater fails to gain traction on Lake Shore Drive. The Town wants the theater torn down, so the existing structure will be gone, one way or another. What if the theater group is unsuccessful there? Would they consider continuing the mission to provide an entertainment venue? Would they consider the preservation of another historic building? In the current Culver real estate market, the lot the theater sits on would sell for a stupid amount of money. The condo owners to the north would bid it up, just to keep it empty. Another developer would no doubt look at a multi story building with condos and maybe a bit of first floor retail. That could be seed money to do something else. What could that something else be?
Take a look at the Wesley United Methodist Church on School Street. As with many modern Methodist Churches, the congregation suffered a schism over a divergence is their beliefs. As with many of the Churches in Culver, Wesley United Methodist Church was already struggling with membership attrition, which was only exacerbated by the split. Is this a chance to save this Church before it lands on Indiana Landmarks Sacred Places list? Constructed in the 50’s (by Easterday Construction!), it is an iconic Culver fixture that should be preserved.
The building is in relatively good condition. Aside from the Sanctuary, which could continue its life as a public gathering space, it also includes a secondary entertainment area in the basement where there has been a stage as well. It has a large, working kitchen, an elevator to access both floors, and many ancillary classrooms and offices that could be repurposed. It sits on wide streets with ample parking and for larger events, it sits a block away from the school parking lots to the north and south. If the venue is successful, College Avenue is wide enough to convert some of the parking to angle parking for additional spaces and the Church owns a vacant lot to the north that could be converted to parking as well.
This takes it away from being in the “Entertainment District”, but in some ways, that’s not a bad thing. The location is easily accessible and does not carry the same parking issues that LSD has. The Church building would be preserved, The Church congregation would no longer have the crushing maintenance issues above and beyond those necessary for the congregation size and thus, would have funds available for growth and pursuit of their mission.
I realize this idea will be scoffed at and likely ridiculed, not in the least by the current Wesley United Methodist Church members, but it is mainly an exercise in looking at options and not being too tightly tied to just one solution. Being fixated on an original idea, can sometimes become debilitating, when there may be more than one solution.
I hope the theater is successful in some form and figures out the sustainability issue. The revival of the theater has been high on the list of surveys done for recent comprehensive plans, and the Stellar efforts. It is good that it is getting some attention, whether it comes to fruition or not.
It was heartwarming to see the elementary kids out helping plant trees at the High School this morning. Kudos to Karen Shuman, School Superintendent, and Kevin Danti, Town Manager, for leading the effort with shovels in hand. Jud Dillon would be proud!
The property has a history with my family, as it was formerly part of my Great Grandpa Russell Easterday’s farm. When I was 7 or 8, I remember riding my bike to the end of Slate Street to give treats of carrots to the members of Grandpa Easterday’s herd of white-faced Hereford cattle that were brave enough to come see me at the fence. At one time, the Easterday farm extended all of the way down to Easterday Construction. Before the office building was built in the 50’s, there were cattle barns and the red barn on the property was known as the pony barn where grandpa kept horses. Russell and Wanda Easterday lived in the brick house on the west side of the north end of Ohio Street.
Arthur Judson “Jud” Dillon and Grandpa Easterday were friends. Like my grandfather, Jud was a farmer that moved on from farming to better support is family. In both cases they became teachers. Grandpa moved on to construction while Jud moved from teacher to guidance counselor to High School Principal. Jud’s farm surrounded the intersection of 10 & 17 at the entrance to Culver from the north. If you look up old deeds in that area, you’ll see that the town lots in that area are part of the Dillon Addition.
When the high school was built, there were few, if any, trees in the pasture. All of the older trees you see around the high school were planted by Jud. Since the high school was built in 1969, and the first Earth Day was in 1970, it’s hard to say if those trees were tied to Earth Day or not. As Jud’s son, Gary, relates it (Stories and Stones ’25, 17 min mark), Jud had an affinity for trees and was responsible for planting them all around Culver while Gary was responsible for watering them.
It’s nice to see the legacy continue. The school property definitely needs a few more trees!
